-
Contributing Member
1918 SMLE .22 Parher Hale
Gent's; I've been having a closer look at my Standard Small Arms made peddeled scheme 1918 SMLE.
There are a couple of odd details; that i would like to find out more about it if possible.
The rifle has been converted to .22 by Parker Hale; It appears to be a solid .22 barrel and not a re-tube. The barrel appears to have a 1918 date code on it and military ownership marks and British Proof for .22.
However the wrist is not marked with the ususal No2MkIV* or .22 markings.
It still wears the original woodwork and steel butt plate by Linley and Co. It is matching numbers.
is it possible that it was built as a .22 directly in 1918 ? or is it more likely that it was built as a .303 then converted later in the year.
Here are some photos. Does anyone else have a similar model without the .22 wrist marking?
Attachment 109505Attachment 109506Attachment 109507Attachment 109508Attachment 109509Attachment 109511Attachment 109510
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
06-30-2020 03:22 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
PH converted it for some commercial customer, who didn't require them to change the markings. The PH name change occurred in the 1930s.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
It would be nice to see a close up picture of the muzzle and crowning.
-
-
Contributing Member
I'll check and see if I have a photo of the muzzle; if not I'll take one at the weekend. It's not marked "Parker rifled" that's for sure.
Thanks for your input.
If it is a tubed barrel; would we not see the original .303 stamps struck out?
-
-
Contributing Member
here is a photo of the muzzle as requested. After looking closely at the muzzle; I thinl it may actually be a tubed barrel. A very small circular line on the muzzle is visible. Maybe some of our expert member's could confirm. Thanks.
Attachment 109639
-